Strategy to Built - Business Consulting for Capital Projects

Click the image to read the full article.
Situation — A Singapore bioprocessing company had to build its first pilot facility on a fixed budget and a hard deadline, with teams who had never briefed a capital project.
Action — A structured Prepare · Listen · Reconcile · Translate process captured every team's requirements, reconciled the conflicts before design began, and translated them into a buildable brief.
Result — Brief completed in six months; facility delivered 22 days ahead of schedule and on budget.

Click the image to read the full article.
Situation — The main kitchen of an ultra-luxurious hotel came in well over budget: intensely complex operational demands, and a premium-equipment specification the tender couldn't meet within cost.
Action — A structured Prepare · Listen · Reconcile · Translate process challenged the operational requirements themselves — separating must-have from nice-to-have, and reconciling alternatives with the operator at every step.
Result — A 15% reduction, signed off by the operator — requirements trimmed to the optimal level, with nothing the operation needed sacrificed.

Click the image to read the full article.
Takeaways:
- Only a small fraction of capital projects finish on budget and on time. The risks are set long before construction begins, in how well the early stages are done.
- The operational brief is the most significant stage. Defining what the facility must do, with every function involved, produces the user brief all later work derives from — and misalignment here compounds through every stage that follows.
- Project life cycle and risks are universal — cut and dice them using different procurement methods. How cost, risk, and control fall between owner and contractor comes down to the procurement approach — and the quality of preparation before it.